Skip to content

Intelligent AI Intake: Building Your Statement

After working with several court clerks and nonprofits to transform traditional form-based intake with AI-powered solutions, we’ve learned that success lies not in flashy demos, but in solving real problems that legal service providers face daily.

The Reality of Legal Intake: Why Traditional Forms Fall Short

Legal intake has always been a bottleneck. Clients arrive overwhelmed, often in crisis situations, needing to provide complex information across multiple domains – personal safety, financial circumstances, housing situations, family dynamics. Traditional paper forms or static digital questionnaires create additional barriers rather than removing them.
The challenge isn’t just collecting information – it’s collecting the *right* information in a way that:
  • Reduces trauma and re-traumatization
  • Ensures factual accuracy and completeness
  • Guides clients toward appropriate remedies
  • Integrates seamlessly with existing workflows

What We’ve Built: AI-Powered Statement Builder for Protection Orders

Our trauma-informed statement builder helps survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and harassment craft compelling petition statements through guided AI conversation that respects their trauma while ensuring legal completeness.

Context-Aware Interviewing:

The AI begins with full knowledge of information the user has already provided during intake – their name, location, the type of protection order needed, and basic case details. This means users never have to repeat themselves or re-explain their situation from scratch.

Trauma-Informed Questioning:

Rather than overwhelming users with complex legal requirements, the AI guides them through a structured conversation using language designed to minimize re-traumatization. For example:
– Instead of: “Describe all incidents of violence”
AI asks: “Can you tell me about the most recent incident that made you feel unsafe? Take your time, and include whatever details feel important to share.”
– Instead of: “What threats were made?”
AI asks: “Did they say anything specific that scared you? You can share their exact words if you remember them, or just the general idea of what they said.”
– Instead of: “List all previous incidents”
AI asks: “Has something like this happened before? Can you tell me about another time you felt unsafe?”

Statement Structure and Guided Flow:

The AI prompts users to provide information in a specific order that naturally creates a court-ready format following legal best practices:
  1. Recent Incident (Opening Paragraph): AI first asks about the most recent incident, gathering detailed descriptions including specific actions, threats, exact words used, date/timeframe, and impact on the victim
  2. Previous Incidents (Middle Paragraphs): AI then asks about earlier events, collecting brief but detailed accounts with dates and specific examples
  3. Requested Protections (Final Section): Finally, AI guides users to articulate what specific protections they are seeking

Preserving Authentic Voice:

The AI never changes the user’s actual words or experiences. It only corrects spelling and punctuation errors while maintaining the user’s authentic voice and perspective. If a user says “He grabbed my arm really hard and it hurt,” the AI keeps those exact words rather than translating them into legal language.

Our Statement Guide Principles:

  • Emphasize clarity and specific details: Include exact quotes of threats, specific actions taken, and precise dates when possible
  • Focus on impact: Help users articulate how each incident made them feel and affected their safety
  • Maintain completeness: Ensure all required legal elements are addressed while respecting the user’s comfort level
  • Use trauma-informed language: Avoid victim-blaming language and provide users control over their narrative

About The Author

Posted in

Related Posts

Violation penalties for stalking no contact order in Illinois

Overview A Stalking No Contact Order (SNCO) is a civil protective mechanism created by the 740 ILCS 21 Act. When a respondent violates any term of that order, Illinois law treats the breach as a criminal offense under 720 ILCS 5/12-3.9. A first violation is a Class A misdemeanor; subsequent violations are elevated to Class…

Read More about Violation penalties for stalking no contact order in Illinois

Duration of stalking no contact order in Illinois

Overview The duration of a Stalking No Contact Order (SNCO) in Illinois determines how long court protection remains in effect and when renewal is necessary. Under the 740 ILCS 21 — Stalking No Contact Order Act, emergency orders last up to 21 days (§ 95), while plenary orders—entered after notice and hearing—may last for up…

Read More about Duration of stalking no contact order in Illinois

Illinois SNCO forms and process

Overview A Stalking No Contact Order (SNCO) is a civil remedy under the 740 ILCS 21 — Illinois Stalking No Contact Order Act, designed to protect individuals from stalking or harassment where no domestic relationship exists. It allows any person who has experienced a pattern of non-consensual contact to seek immediate and long-term protection through…

Read More about Illinois SNCO forms and process

Emergency stalking no contact order IL

Overview An Emergency Stalking No Contact Order (E-SNCO) is a temporary civil order issued by an Illinois court to protect individuals facing immediate danger from stalking behaviors. Authorized by 740 ILCS 21/95, it provides swift, ex parte relief—meaning the respondent does not need to be present or notified beforehand—when the petitioner demonstrates that stalking has…

Read More about Emergency stalking no contact order IL
Scroll To Top