Skip to content

Intelligent AI Intake: Building Your Statement

After working with several court clerks and nonprofits to transform traditional form-based intake with AI-powered solutions, we’ve learned that success lies not in flashy demos, but in solving real problems that legal service providers face daily.

The Reality of Legal Intake: Why Traditional Forms Fall Short

Legal intake has always been a bottleneck. Clients arrive overwhelmed, often in crisis situations, needing to provide complex information across multiple domains – personal safety, financial circumstances, housing situations, family dynamics. Traditional paper forms or static digital questionnaires create additional barriers rather than removing them.
The challenge isn’t just collecting information – it’s collecting the *right* information in a way that:
  • Reduces trauma and re-traumatization
  • Ensures factual accuracy and completeness
  • Guides clients toward appropriate remedies
  • Integrates seamlessly with existing workflows

What We’ve Built: AI-Powered Statement Builder for Protection Orders

Our trauma-informed statement builder helps survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and harassment craft compelling petition statements through guided AI conversation that respects their trauma while ensuring legal completeness.

Context-Aware Interviewing:

The AI begins with full knowledge of information the user has already provided during intake – their name, location, the type of protection order needed, and basic case details. This means users never have to repeat themselves or re-explain their situation from scratch.

Trauma-Informed Questioning:

Rather than overwhelming users with complex legal requirements, the AI guides them through a structured conversation using language designed to minimize re-traumatization. For example:
– Instead of: “Describe all incidents of violence”
AI asks: “Can you tell me about the most recent incident that made you feel unsafe? Take your time, and include whatever details feel important to share.”
– Instead of: “What threats were made?”
AI asks: “Did they say anything specific that scared you? You can share their exact words if you remember them, or just the general idea of what they said.”
– Instead of: “List all previous incidents”
AI asks: “Has something like this happened before? Can you tell me about another time you felt unsafe?”

Statement Structure and Guided Flow:

The AI prompts users to provide information in a specific order that naturally creates a court-ready format following legal best practices:
  1. Recent Incident (Opening Paragraph): AI first asks about the most recent incident, gathering detailed descriptions including specific actions, threats, exact words used, date/timeframe, and impact on the victim
  2. Previous Incidents (Middle Paragraphs): AI then asks about earlier events, collecting brief but detailed accounts with dates and specific examples
  3. Requested Protections (Final Section): Finally, AI guides users to articulate what specific protections they are seeking

Preserving Authentic Voice:

The AI never changes the user’s actual words or experiences. It only corrects spelling and punctuation errors while maintaining the user’s authentic voice and perspective. If a user says “He grabbed my arm really hard and it hurt,” the AI keeps those exact words rather than translating them into legal language.

Our Statement Guide Principles:

  • Emphasize clarity and specific details: Include exact quotes of threats, specific actions taken, and precise dates when possible
  • Focus on impact: Help users articulate how each incident made them feel and affected their safety
  • Maintain completeness: Ensure all required legal elements are addressed while respecting the user’s comfort level
  • Use trauma-informed language: Avoid victim-blaming language and provide users control over their narrative

About The Author

Posted in

Related Posts

Can I Appeal A Small Claims Judgment Illinois

Overview In Illinois, every party in a small claims case—plaintiff or defendant—has the right to appeal a judgment entered by a circuit-court judge. Although the small claims division is designed for speed and informality, its decisions are legally binding. If you believe the judge misapplied the law, ignored important evidence, or reached a conclusion unsupported…

Read More about Can I Appeal A Small Claims Judgment Illinois

Illinois Small Claims court Process Self Represented

Overview The Illinois Small Claims Court is designed for speed, simplicity, and self-representation. It handles civil disputes involving $10,000 or less, excluding interest and court costs. The process is structured to be accessible to citizens without lawyers—what Illinois courts call “pro se” litigants. By providing standardized forms, plain-language instructions, and flexible scheduling, the small-claims system…

Read More about Illinois Small Claims court Process Self Represented

Illinois mall Claims Court Forms Fees

Overview The Illinois Small Claims Court provides an efficient and affordable way for individuals and small businesses to resolve monetary disputes of $10,000 or less. Designed for self-represented litigants (pro se), the system simplifies traditional civil procedures through standardized forms, limited motion practice, and straightforward evidence rules. Every county follows uniform requirements based on Illinois…

Read More about Illinois mall Claims Court Forms Fees

What Qualifies For Small Claims Court Illinois

Overview The Illinois Small Claims Court exists to resolve civil disputes involving money claims of $10,000 or less. It provides a simple, fast, and affordable way for people to pursue justice without needing an attorney. The rules are governed by Illinois Supreme Court Rules 281–289, which simplify filing requirements, remove most formal discovery, and encourage…

Read More about What Qualifies For Small Claims Court Illinois
Scroll To Top