Intelligent AI Intake: Building Your Statement
The Reality of Legal Intake: Why Traditional Forms Fall Short
- Reduces trauma and re-traumatization
- Ensures factual accuracy and completeness
- Guides clients toward appropriate remedies
- Integrates seamlessly with existing workflows
What We’ve Built: AI-Powered Statement Builder for Protection Orders
Context-Aware Interviewing:
Trauma-Informed Questioning:
– Instead of: “Describe all incidents of violence”– AI asks: “Can you tell me about the most recent incident that made you feel unsafe? Take your time, and include whatever details feel important to share.”– Instead of: “What threats were made?”– AI asks: “Did they say anything specific that scared you? You can share their exact words if you remember them, or just the general idea of what they said.”– Instead of: “List all previous incidents”– AI asks: “Has something like this happened before? Can you tell me about another time you felt unsafe?”
Statement Structure and Guided Flow:
- Recent Incident (Opening Paragraph): AI first asks about the most recent incident, gathering detailed descriptions including specific actions, threats, exact words used, date/timeframe, and impact on the victim
- Previous Incidents (Middle Paragraphs): AI then asks about earlier events, collecting brief but detailed accounts with dates and specific examples
- Requested Protections (Final Section): Finally, AI guides users to articulate what specific protections they are seeking
Preserving Authentic Voice:
Our Statement Guide Principles:
- Emphasize clarity and specific details: Include exact quotes of threats, specific actions taken, and precise dates when possible
- Focus on impact: Help users articulate how each incident made them feel and affected their safety
- Maintain completeness: Ensure all required legal elements are addressed while respecting the user’s comfort level
- Use trauma-informed language: Avoid victim-blaming language and provide users control over their narrative
Sample Conversation Example:
Related Posts
Can I Appeal A Small Claims Judgment Illinois
Overview In Illinois, every party in a small claims case—plaintiff or defendant—has the right to appeal a judgment entered by a circuit-court judge. Although the small claims division is designed for speed and informality, its decisions are legally binding. If you believe the judge misapplied the law, ignored important evidence, or reached a conclusion unsupported…
Illinois Small Claims court Process Self Represented
Overview The Illinois Small Claims Court is designed for speed, simplicity, and self-representation. It handles civil disputes involving $10,000 or less, excluding interest and court costs. The process is structured to be accessible to citizens without lawyers—what Illinois courts call “pro se” litigants. By providing standardized forms, plain-language instructions, and flexible scheduling, the small-claims system…
Illinois mall Claims Court Forms Fees
Overview The Illinois Small Claims Court provides an efficient and affordable way for individuals and small businesses to resolve monetary disputes of $10,000 or less. Designed for self-represented litigants (pro se), the system simplifies traditional civil procedures through standardized forms, limited motion practice, and straightforward evidence rules. Every county follows uniform requirements based on Illinois…
What Qualifies For Small Claims Court Illinois
Overview The Illinois Small Claims Court exists to resolve civil disputes involving money claims of $10,000 or less. It provides a simple, fast, and affordable way for people to pursue justice without needing an attorney. The rules are governed by Illinois Supreme Court Rules 281–289, which simplify filing requirements, remove most formal discovery, and encourage…