Receiving Payments for Court Cases
Recently updated on April 18th, 2025 at 11:29 pm
LegalAtoms allows petitioners a complete experience to file for fee waivers but in case users opt to pay, then there is an easy way to collect filing fees.
This can be done in one of the following ways
- Directly integrate your existing payment processing vendor
- Use the payment processor integrated with our Website right now (Stripe) and electronically deposit the funds into your bank account etc. More info on Stripe and their fees is here https://stripe.com/pricing
Please contact us for setting up payment processing
About The Author
Related Posts
Roommate Harassment Laws in California
Recently updated on April 18th, 2025 at 10:50 pm Living with a roommate can be a great way to share expenses and enjoy company, but when things turn toxic, the law may need to step in. In California, roommate harassment can be addressed through a Civil Harassment Restraining Order (CHRO), which offers legal protections…
How Does a Restraining Order Work if You Live in the Same House
Recently updated on April 18th, 2025 at 11:00 pm In California, a restraining order is sought by a victim of abuse to ban certain actions on the abuser. Some of the most common restrictions are: i) to not contact the victim, and ii) to stay a certain distance away — both of which would not…
Protective Order Law in New York
Recently updated on April 18th, 2025 at 11:05 pm In New York, the laws governing Orders of Protection (commonly referred to as Protective Orders) are designed to prevent abuse, harassment, stalking, or threats from a specific person. These laws fall under New York Family Court Act § 812, and related sections. You may be eligible…
What Proof Do You Need For A Restraining Order in New York
Recently updated on April 18th, 2025 at 10:45 pm In order to get a Restraining Order (also call Order of Protection) in the New York state, the proof needed is that more likely than not abuse occurred as defined in Family Court Act (FCA) § 812. The standard of “more likely than not” means enough…